Correctional Facilities
H CSD Headquarters
1 Lo Wu Correctional Institution
2 Pik Uk Correctional Institution
3 Pik Uk Prison
4 Custodial ward at Queen Elizabeth Hospital
5 Pelican House
6 Phoenix House
7 Lai Hang Rehabilitation Centre
8 Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre
9 Lai King Correctional Institution
10 Chi Lan Rehabilitation Centre
11 Tai Lam Centre for Women
12 Tai Lam Correctional Institution
13 Bauhinia House
14 Wai Lan Rehabilitation Centre
S Staff Training Institute Correctional Facilities
15 Siu Lam Psychiatric Centre
16 Cape Collinson Correctional Institution
17 Stanley Prison
18 Tung Tau Correctional Institution
19 Pak Sha Wan Correctional Institution
20 Custodial ward at Queen Mary Hospital
21 Hei Ling Chau Correctional Institution
22 Hei Ling Chau Addiction Treatment Centre
23 Nei Kwu Correctional Institution
24 Lai Sun Correctional Institution
25 Tong Fuk Correctional Institution
26 Shek Pik Prison
27 Sha Tsui Correctional Institution
28 Lai Chi Rehabilitation Centre
Hong Kong Correctional Services Medal for Distinguished Service (CSDSM)
Hong Kong Correctional Services Medal for Meritorious Service (CSMSM)
Secretary for the Civil Service’s Commendation
Commissioner’s Commendation
Assistant Commissioner’s Commendation
Year | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Cases entailing CIU investigation | 123 | 81 | 119 | |||
Use of unnecessary force | 22 | 9 | 10 | ||||
Misconduct of staff | 50 | 33 | 53 | ||||
Negligence of duty | 15 | 13 | 22 | ||||
Abuse of authority | 26 | 12 | 21 | ||||
Injustice in disciplinary action | 8 | 13 | 11 | ||||
Institutional policy / procedure | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||||
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
B | Cases handled by institutions under CIU monitoring② | 55 | 46 | 14 | |||
C | Repeated complaints handled by CIU in a simple administrative way③ | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
D | Cases of requests / enquiries handled by CIU④ | 161 | 213 | 371 | |||
Total (A+B+C+D) | 339 | 340 | 504 | ||||
Year | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||
E | Findings of CIU investigation endorsed by Correctional Services Department Complaints Committee (CSDCC) | 95 | 98 | 114 | |||
Substantiated | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Substantiated other than reported | 0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
Not fully substantiated | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||||
False | 4 | 4 | 8 | ||||
False & malicious | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Faultless | 11 | 4 | 1 | ||||
Not Proven | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
Unsubstantiated | 52 | 56 | 67 | ||||
Curtailed | 14 | 18 | 31 | ||||
Not Pursuable | 9 | 10 | 1 | ||||
Withdrawn | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
F | Cases re-examined by CSDCC⑤ | 5 | 0 | 0 | |||
G | Cases of appeal handled by Commissioner of Correctional Services (CCS)⑥ | 3 | 1 | 0 | |||
H | Cases of appeal handled by Correctional Services Department Complaints Appeal Board (CSDCAB)⑦ | 9 | 8 | 15 | |||
I | Recommendation for service improvement endorsed by CSDCC | 23 | 32 | 31 | |||
'-' | denotes 'Not applicable' | ||||||
① | Since 2017, the number of cases received by CIU as published in this Annual Review included cases lodged by CSD staff, and such inclusion as well reflected in the statistics of 2016 and 2017. | ||||||
② | The cases were complaints of minor and operational nature such as institutional environment, diet and visit arrangement. | ||||||
③ | Those complaints were grievances repeatedly raised by the same complainant. In order to prevent the complainant from further abusing the complaints handling mechanism of the Department, CIU handled those cases in a simple administrative way. | ||||||
④ | The cases included those raised via CIU email, phone calls, visiting CIU or referred by 1823. | ||||||
⑤ | CSDCC completed handling all cases of re-examination in 2017. | ||||||
⑥ | CCS completed handling all complaint cases of appeal to CCS in 2018. | ||||||
⑦ | CSDCAB was established w.e.f. 1 August 2016, replacing the former appeal handling mechanism, i.e. re-examination by CSDCC and appeal to CCS. | ||||||
Correctional Facilities
H CSD Headquarters
1 Lo Wu Correctional Institution
2 Pik Uk Correctional Institution
3 Pik Uk Prison
4 Custodial ward at Queen Elizabeth Hospital
5 Pelican House
6 Phoenix House
7 Lai Hang Rehabilitation Centre
8 Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre
9 Lai King Correctional Institution
10 Chi Lan Rehabilitation Centre
11 Tai Lam Centre for Women
12 Tai Lam Correctional Institution
13 Bauhinia House
14 Wai Lan Rehabilitation Centre
S Staff Training Institute Correctional Facilities
15 Siu Lam Psychiatric Centre
16 Cape Collinson Correctional Institution
17 Stanley Prison
18 Tung Tau Correctional Institution
19 Pak Sha Wan Correctional Institution
20 Custodial ward at Queen Mary Hospital
21 Hei Ling Chau Correctional Institution
22 Hei Ling Chau Addiction Treatment Centre
23 Nei Kwu Correctional Institution
24 Lai Sun Correctional Institution
25 Tong Fuk Correctional Institution
26 Shek Pik Prison
27 Sha Tsui Correctional Institution
28 Lai Chi Rehabilitation Centre
Hong Kong Correctional Services Medal for Distinguished Service (CSDSM)
Hong Kong Correctional Services Medal for Meritorious Service (CSMSM)
Secretary for the Civil Service’s Commendation
Commissioner’s Commendation
Assistant Commissioner’s Commendation
Year | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Cases entailing CIU investigation | 123 | 81 | 119 | |||
Use of unnecessary force | 22 | 9 | 10 | ||||
Misconduct of staff | 50 | 33 | 53 | ||||
Negligence of duty | 15 | 13 | 22 | ||||
Abuse of authority | 26 | 12 | 21 | ||||
Injustice in disciplinary action | 8 | 13 | 11 | ||||
Institutional policy / procedure | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||||
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
B | Cases handled by institutions under CIU monitoring② | 55 | 46 | 14 | |||
C | Repeated complaints handled by CIU in a simple administrative way③ | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
D | Cases of requests / enquiries handled by CIU④ | 161 | 213 | 371 | |||
Total (A+B+C+D) | 339 | 340 | 504 | ||||
Year | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||
E | Findings of CIU investigation endorsed by Correctional Services Department Complaints Committee (CSDCC) | 95 | 98 | 114 | |||
Substantiated | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Substantiated other than reported | 0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
Not fully substantiated | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||||
False | 4 | 4 | 8 | ||||
False & malicious | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Faultless | 11 | 4 | 1 | ||||
Not Proven | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
Unsubstantiated | 52 | 56 | 67 | ||||
Curtailed | 14 | 18 | 31 | ||||
Not Pursuable | 9 | 10 | 1 | ||||
Withdrawn | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||
F | Cases re-examined by CSDCC⑤ | 5 | 0 | 0 | |||
G | Cases of appeal handled by Commissioner of Correctional Services (CCS)⑥ | 3 | 1 | 0 | |||
H | Cases of appeal handled by Correctional Services Department Complaints Appeal Board (CSDCAB)⑦ | 9 | 8 | 15 | |||
I | Recommendation for service improvement endorsed by CSDCC | 23 | 32 | 31 | |||
'-' | denotes 'Not applicable' | ||||||
① | Since 2017, the number of cases received by CIU as published in this Annual Review included cases lodged by CSD staff, and such inclusion as well reflected in the statistics of 2016 and 2017. | ||||||
② | The cases were complaints of minor and operational nature such as institutional environment, diet and visit arrangement. | ||||||
③ | Those complaints were grievances repeatedly raised by the same complainant. In order to prevent the complainant from further abusing the complaints handling mechanism of the Department, CIU handled those cases in a simple administrative way. | ||||||
④ | The cases included those raised via CIU email, phone calls, visiting CIU or referred by 1823. | ||||||
⑤ | CSDCC completed handling all cases of re-examination in 2017. | ||||||
⑥ | CCS completed handling all complaint cases of appeal to CCS in 2018. | ||||||
⑦ | CSDCAB was established w.e.f. 1 August 2016, replacing the former appeal handling mechanism, i.e. re-examination by CSDCC and appeal to CCS. | ||||||
Copyright © 2019 Correctional Services Department (CSD). All Rights Reserved.